Dick Cheney and the twilight of the West that still believed in itself

Andrea Maniscalco
06/11/2025
Roots

Why his legacy remains a warning to those who have forgotten the strength of the free world.

The last true Republican

With the death of Dick Cheney, one of the last interpreters of a serious, institutional, moral conservatism disappears. A man of power in the fullest – but also noblest – sense of the term, Cheney belonged to that generation of Republicans for whomfreedom, responsibility and defence of the West were the three pillars of politics.

There was nothing in him of the brawling populism and media sensationalism that dominate parts of the American right today. Cheney did not seek consensus: he sought direction. He was convinced that force should serve to preserve freedom, not replace it; and that American leadership was not a concession of fate, but a moral duty.

America as leader of a free world, with a strong Europe

For Cheney, the global role of the United States was not a privilege to be exercised at will, but a responsibility to be assumed without hesitation. He believed – with a lucidity rare today – that if America stopped leading, the free world would cease to exist.

It was this vision, often called ‘neo-conservative’, that oriented American foreign policy in the early 2000s: an idea of theWest as a moral bloc, not just a military or economic one. A community of nations linked not by contingent interests, but by common values: individual freedom, liberal democracy, market economy and defence of the international order.

In a world increasingly tempted by relativism and ambiguity, Cheney represented clarity. Not that of simplifications, but that of convictions.

Strength as a moral duty

More than a war strategist, Cheney was a strategist of responsibility. At the most critical moments in recent American history, he understood that security is never a technical matter, but a moral choice.

His decisions, often the subject of debate, stemmed from a deep conviction: that America could not afford neutrality in the face of evil, and that defending freedom in the world meant, first and foremost, defending itself.

In a context of global threats, he was able to interpret force as a guarantee of stability and as a tool in the service of a principle: that peace is not the child of inertia, but of deterrence.



The demise of responsible conservatism

Today, the Republican Party appears fragmented between shouted populism and sterile nostalgia. The idea of a liberal, western and institutional right – that of Bush the father, Reagan and Cheney himself – seems to have dissolved under the weight of anger and resentment.

But without that right, America also loses its balance. And with it, the entire West loses its compass. Cheney represented the link between the America that fought for freedom and the one that now often retreats into its own isolationism, forgetting that hegemony is not only power, but also responsibility.

His republicanism was not identity-based, but universal: he was not defending one people against another, but an idea of civilisation against barbarism.

The West must rediscover its mission

If there is one message that the figure of Dick Cheney leaves for those who still believe in the free world today, it is that Western civilisation cannot survive its timidity.

It cannot hesitate, apologise for existing, deny its moral strength. Defending the West does not mean idolising the past, but remembering that freedom is not neutral. It is a choice, and as such must be defended every day.

It means having the courage to say that liberal democracy is not perfect, but it is infinitely superior to those who threaten it – from Putin’s Russia to theIran of the ayatollahs, from authoritarian China to illiberal domestic drifts. Cheney knew that freedom must be protected even when it is unpopular. And that America – and Europe with it – has a duty to continue to believe in it.

A message for Europe

For Europe, the lesson of Cheney is clear: without leadership that knows how to take risks, the West dissolves into rhetoric. Foreign policy cannot be reduced to declarations of principle, nor can the defence of values be outsourced to others.

Freedom is a collective responsibility, and there is no neutrality between those who defend it and those who threaten it.

On a continent that often takes refuge in the diplomacy of balance, Cheney reminds us that peace does not come from equidistance, but from moral clarity.

Believing again

With his passing, we lose not only a leading figure in American politics, but a symbol of that Western steadfastness that today seems a distant memory.

Yet if the West wants to survive, it will have to return to believing in itself as Dick Cheney did: without complexes, without hesitation, with the certainty that freedom – even when it divides – remains the only cause worth fighting for.

His legacy is not only American: it is an invitation to us Europeans not to forget who we are, where we come from and why, even today, the free world exists.


Europe House